Wednesday, October 22, 2008

three questions - chapter three

(one) can an installation count on human nature/tendencies to produce an interaction, therefore fulfilling the meaning of the installation? and how can this be done?
are there any limits?

(two) how does an installation trick a viewer into interacting with it? can it be disguised as a regular interaction, but also be seen as art as well?

(three) if the viewer plays a large role in the purpose of an installation, does it still have purpose without the viewer, without someone to interact with it?

No comments: